Fragments: pots, patchworks, power figures

Exhibition texts

The title “Fragments” alludes to two categories of works: such that have been assembled from separate pieces, and such that have fallen to pieces or are in the process of doing so. We focus on the power of combining, the art of separating, and the force of destruction.

From modest to precious, from pragmatic to exclusive, from self-evidential to extraordinary, and from deserted to ruined – in each case, the fragments stand for individual skills and culture-specific knowledge, for histories and stories that may well also tell of injuries, wounds, and destruction. Even in their fragmentary makeup, the pieces remain recognizable and stimulate one’s imagination. On top of that, they disclose cultural requirements and functions by means of their nature and the materials used, and reveal aesthetic dimensions.

Work categories – The works on display belong to different categories and are distinguished by the way they came to be. Whether we are dealing with purposefully created assemblages, potent objects, power-enhancing arrangements, everyday objects saved from withering away, things left to decay, and leftovers from acts of destruction – what all the works have in common is that they embody fragments of history and narratives.

Contexts and perspectives – Fragments refer to the restoration or creation of order. They reveal how people act with or through material things, they can confer or withdraw power and strength, they require care and attention, and occasionally – for whatever reasons – they have to be discarded. Depending on the perspective, processes of fragmentation look quite different: there is a fundamental difference between the way the societies of origin look at them compared to the scholarly approach; economic dynamics result in a different approach than one guided by ethical principles; finally, it also raises the question as to how far or in which way, Western museums were involved in or even provoked the fragmentation of individual works.

Qualities – All the pieces on display embody poetic and aesthetic qualities. Each one of them stands for itself but, at the same time, it bears evidence to the culture-specific use of different materials, how they were combined and what impact they had. Fragments, splinters, shards, particles, and shreds hold the potential to articulate what is suppressed, to shift the divergent into focus, and to open up new perspectives on specific events or on life as such. Ethnographic museums in particular are challenged to deal with parts, fragments, and splinters in order to better understand and address a splintered world.

 

Bark cloth from a lime or maple tree, dried seaweed, black kelp, and heaps of rushes are held together by strings made of rice straw. The single elements as such are nothing to write home about; it’s only when they are combined through diligent work in all their shades of colour that they create an impressive assemblage: we are speaking of a Japanese rain cape, mino. This pieced-together work is an article of daily use; for ages it was worn as a protection against rain and snow, not only over a samurai armour but also on journeys and for work in the fields and similar daily chores.
Some figures in the classical Japanese theatre wear a mino just as groups of men do in the northern part of the island of Honshu when they dress up and parade in the streets to usher in the New Year. Recently, the mino has become popular in the cosplay scene in which people take on the shape of manga and anime figures.
A mino is a single object and an ensemble at the same time; its production required skilled hands and a sense of aesthetics. As early as the 17th century, the cape inspired the Japanese poet Matsuo Bashô (1644-1694) to write:

The first winter shower –
even the little monkey craves
for a cape of straw!

  1. Rain cape mino, Prefecture of Akita, Japan; 20th c.; rushes, bark cloth, seaweed, rice straw, vegetable fibre; Noemi Speiser, purchased in 1971, IId 8128

 

Wallen Mapondera combines in his work national and international incidences with personal experiences. For this he has developed a radically abstract language with the aid of fragments and found pieces: from packaging (as for foodstuffs in Tribal Print) and cardboard to torn tent canvases and used floorboards to egg shells. His is interested in the volatility and transience of meanings and values as embodied by these materials through focusing on
the transformational potential inherent in the materials.

 

2. a
Tribal Print
Wallen Mapondera, 2020
Cardboard, thread, mixed technique
Courtesy of SMAC Gallery, © Wallen Mapondera

Open Secret with its gaping red wound is a commentary on the fragility of things and living beings. With this work, Mapondera denounces the rampant state corruption in Zimbabwe.

2. b
Open Secret
Wallen Mapondera, 2020
Cardboard, wax paper, cotton, waxed thread on canvas
Courtesy of SMAC Gallery, © Wallen Mapondera